Author

admin

Browsing

African governments have criticized a speech by French President Emmanuel Macron in which he said that some leaders showed “ingratitude” for the deployment of his nation’s troops in the Sahel region in battling Islamist extremism.

Macron told French ambassadors at a conference in Paris on Monday that Sahel nations – beset by civil conflicts and violent extremism – only remained sovereign because of the deployment of French forces.

Macron also dismissed the notion that French troops had been expelled from the Sahel, an area that sits just below the Sahara Desert, as Paris’ influence on its former colonies wanes.

“We had a security relationship. It was in two folds: One was our commitment against terrorism since 2013. I think someone forgot to say thank you. It does not matter, it will come with time,” Macron said at the conference.

“Ingratitude, I am well placed to know, is a disease not transmissible to man.”

Macron’s comments were denounced by Chad’s foreign affairs minister, Abderaman Koulamallah, who accused the French leader of showing “a contemptuous attitude towards Africa and Africans.”

The French leader blamed the exit of his country’s forces from the region on successive coups.

“We left because there were coups d’état. We were there at the request of sovereign states that had asked France to come. From the moment there were coups d’état, and when people said ‘our priority is no longer the fight against terrorism’… France no longer had a place there because we are not the auxiliaries of putschists. So, we left.”

In recent years, French troops have withdrawn from Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali following coups in the West African nations where anti-French sentiment has become rife. They are also preparing their exit from Chad, Ivory Coast and Senegal. French forces similarly left the Central African Republic in 2022 after deploying there in 2013 following a coup that sparked a civil war.

“None of them would be a sovereign country today if the French army had not deployed in the region,” Macron said, adding: “My heart goes out to all our soldiers who sometimes gave their lives and fought for years. We did well.”

Koulamallah said in a statement that, “France has never endowed the Chadian army in a significant way nor contributed to its structural development.” The Chadian minister added: “In 60 years of existence, marked by civil wars, rebellions and prolonged political instability, French contribution has often been limited to its own strategic interests, with no real lasting impact on the development of the Chadian people.”

Chad announced in November it was ending its defense cooperation with France to reassert its sovereignty.

Macron insisted in his address on Monday that France’s influence was not in decline in Africa but that the nation was only “reorganizing itself” on the continent.

His stance was rejected by Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko who explained in a statement Monday that Senegal’s decision to close all foreign military bases, including those of the French, “stems from its sole will, as a free, independent and sovereign country,” adding there were “no discussions or negotiations” with the French.

“Let us note that France has neither the capacity nor the legitimacy to ensure Africa’s security and sovereignty,” Sonko stated.

Activists in Africa were also outraged over Macron’s comments.

“Macron’s statement that African leaders should be grateful for France’s military interventions, claiming that West Africa’s sovereignty owes its existence to the French army, reeks of revisionism and intellectual dishonesty and moral bankruptcy,” Togolese writer and social activist Farida Bemba Nabourema wrote in a lengthy post on X.

“This paternalistic rhetoric, which infantilizes African nations as incapable of self-governance, is deeply rooted in the racism that justified colonization in the first place and continues to nourish neo-colonialism today,” Nabourema added.

Sahel aligns with Russia

Russian military support has become an increasingly sought-after alternative by some Sahel nations who have moved on from their former Western partners.

Junta-led Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso have since signed military partnerships with Moscow, receiving contingents of Russian military instructors from the shadowy mercenary group, Wagner.

Wagner forces have also reportedly arrived in Equatorial Guinea where they are tasked with protecting its authoritarian leader President Teodoro Obiang, mirroring the activities of the Russian mercenaries in the neighboring Central African Republic where they have evolved into the dominant foreign force.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

U.S. Steel and the Japanese firm that had sought to acquire it are suing the Biden administration after the president announced he was blocking a proposed deal for the iconic American manufacturer.

U.S. Steel and Japan’s Nippon Steel said in a release Monday that President Joe Biden ‘ignored the rule of law’ to gain favor with United Steelworkers, the union representing many of U.S. Steel’s employees, when he announced Friday he would not allow the acquisition to go through.

Separately, U.S. Steel and Nippon said they were also suing the president of the union, David McCall, as well as the head of an Ohio-based rival mining firm, Cleveland-Cliffs, accusing them of illegally coordinating to undermine the transaction.

Nippon Steel had proposed a $14 billion deal to buy U.S. Steel, but the agreement, which U.S. Steel executives favored, became mired in a national security review by a Treasury Department committee that assesses foreign ownership proposals.

Ultimately, the committee failed to agree on whether Nippon ownership posed a security risk, and it asked Biden for a final decision. In announcing his veto of the deal, Biden said shifting the firm out of American hands would undermine critical supply chains and put jobs at risk.

The Treasury committee, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Attorney General Merrick Garland are also named in the suit.  

“A committee of national security and trade experts determined this acquisition would create risk for American national security,’ a Biden administration spokesperson said in an emailed statement. ‘President Biden will never hesitate to protect the security of this nation, its infrastructure, and the resilience of its supply chains.’

McCall, the steelworkers union boss, said in a statement that he was reviewing the suit.

‘By blocking Nippon Steel’s attempt to acquire U.S. Steel, the Biden administration protected vital U.S. interests, safeguarded our national security and helped preserve a domestic steel industry that underpins our country’s critical supply chains,’ he said.

Lourenco Goncalves, the president, chairman and CEO of Cleveland-Cliffs, accused U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel of trying to ‘play the blame game.’

‘Today’s lawsuits against the U.S. Government, the USW, and Cleveland-Cliffs represent a shameless effort to scapegoat others for U.S. Steel’s and Nippon Steel’s self-inflicted disaster,’ Goncalves said in a statement.

‘Cleveland-Cliffs and the USW were not the only ones who recognized the adverse national security implications of this acquisition. This deal drew instant bi-partisan opposition, including from President Trump, who has vowed multiple times that he would block the deal,’ Goncalves added.

After the suits were announced Monday, President-elect Donald Trump, who had expressed opposition to the deal while he was campaigning last year, posted on his Truth Social platform: “Why would they want to sell U.S. Steel now when Tariffs will make it a much more profitable and valuable company. Wouldn’t it be nice to have U.S. Steel, once the greatest company in the World, lead the charge toward greatness again? It can all happen very quickly!”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The Russell 2000 ETF managed a double-digit gain in 2024, but did it the hard way with several deep pullbacks. Pullbacks within uptrends are opportunities and we can find such opportunities using %B.

The chart below shows the Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) with the Zigzag(8) indicator. This indicator changes direction when there is a move greater than 8%, which means it ignores price moves that are less than 8%. I am showing this indicator to highlight five pullbacks of 8% or more in 2024. That’s a lot. In contrast, the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) only experienced one 8+ percent pullback in early August.

Overall, IWM advanced 10% in 2024. That seems like a good year, but it was a “hard” 10% when we include the five 8+ percent pullbacks. This is simply the nature of small-cap stocks. They are less “trendy” than large-caps and have higher betas, making them more susceptible to wider fluctuations. Traders need to consider this when trading small-caps. As noted in Chart Trader this week, we see similar price action in the S&P 500 EW ETF (RSP) and S&P MidCap 400 SPDR (MDY).

Click here to take Chart Trader trial and get immediate access.

Buying upside breakouts is probably not the best strategy for trading IWM. Instead, traders should consider pullbacks and mean-reversion opportunities. We can identify such opportunities using Bollinger Bands (20,2) and %B (20,2). The middle line on the Bollinger Bands is the 20-day SMA and the bands are two standard deviations above and below. A close below the lower band means price fell two standard deviations and this creates an oversold condition.

Chartists can quantify oversold conditions using %B, which falls below 0 when the close is below the lower Bollinger Band. The blue lines on the chart above show %B dipping below 0 four times in 2024. Note that I would also only look for oversold conditions when price is above the 200-day SMA (long-term uptrend). When the bigger trend is up, a close below the lower Bollinger Band signals an oversold condition that can lead to a bounce.

December was a rough month for many stocks and ETFs. Even so, the weight of the evidence remains bullish for stocks and these pullbacks look like corrections within bigger uptrends. This week’s reports and videos focused on long-term breadth indicators, short-term oversold breadth, leading ETFs and a dozen ETFs with tradable pullbacks.

Click here to take a Chart Trader trial and get immediate access.

///////////////////////////////////////////////

Multiple Israeli settler attacks against Palestinians have been reported in parts of the occupied West Bank after gunmen killed three settlers and injured eight others earlier on Monday in the latest explosion of violence there.

While tensions have been rising in the West Bank for years, the October 7 attacks by Hamas and the subsequent Israeli assault on Gaza has ushered in a volatile new chapter in the occupied territory.

Attacks on Palestinian communities by Israeli settlers, emboldened by their country’s offensive in Gaza and support from Israel’s right-wing government, have increased – while there have also been attacks against the settlers.

Earlier on Monday, Israeli vehicles were targeted on Route 55 in Al-Funduq, a Palestinian village in the West Bank, according to Israeli authorities. The road, which snakes through the northern West Bank, passes through the Jewish settlement of Kedumim.

Two women in one car were shot dead and a man in a second car 160 yards away died of gunshot wounds, Israel’s Magen David Adom (MDA) emergency service said.

A further eight people were injured in the attack, including the bus driver, who was shot in his limbs and abdomen, according to the MDA.

The deadly shooting sent tensions soaring and within hours the official Palestinian news agency WAFA reported multiple attacks on Palestinians.

On the incident in Hajja, the Israeli military said they received several reports on Monday evening of “Israeli civilians who entered the village” and had “caused damage to property” and Israeli came to the scene.

Two more incidents were reported southeast of Ramallah where Israeli settlers set fire to an agricultural room in the town of Turmus Ayya on Monday evening, according to security sources who told WAFA. Meanwhile Israeli settlers attacked Palestinian vehicles with stones near Bethlehem, according to WAFA.

‘Settle accounts’

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed retaliation following the attack by gunmen earlier in the day. In a statement on X, he pledged to “find the abhorrent murderers and settle accounts with them and with all those who aided them. No one will get away.”

Netanyahu is expected to hold a cabinet meeting on Tuesday and discuss the West Bank.

While there has been no claim of responsibility yet for the shooting, it has been praised by the Palestinian militant group Hamas and been labelled a “terrorist attack” by Israel.

Speaking at the scene, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) chief Herzi Halevi said the “clock is ticking” for the attackers, and vowed to track down those responsible, make the route safer, and intensify Israel’s “intense and wide-ranging” operations “against terrorism” in the occupied West Bank.

Israeli authorities later identified the two women as Aliza Reiss and Rachel Cohen – two civilian residents of Kedumim, both in their 70s – and the man as Yaakov Winkelstein, a police investigator from Ariel, a settlement south of the site of the attack.

Rephaela Segal, assistant mayor of Kedumim, described the women as “young in nature” and said Cohen had been volunteering as a special education teacher in her retirement. Reiss was a counselor at a high school in a nearby settlement, Karnei Shomron, and both were traveling to Karnei Shomron at the time of the attack, Segal said.

This isn’t the first time in recent months that violence has broken out in this part of the West Bank. In August 2024, a group of 30 armed Israeli settlers attacked Jit, a Palestinian town just 10 minutes from Kedumim. They fired bullets, tear gas and set homes and cars on fire, according to residents who witnessed the attack.

Volatile new chapter

Recent international focus on the region has been largely on Israel’s military operations in Gaza. But another major escalation of violence has been playing out around 60 miles away in the Israeli-occupied West Bank where 3.3 million Palestinians are living under Israeli military occupation surrounded by hundreds of thousands of Israeli settlers. Such Israeli settlements are considered illegal under international law and by much of the international community.

According to the UN, more than 500 Palestinian civilians were killed in the West Bank during 2024, with children bearing much of the violence. The UN said in December that 2024 had been a deadlier year for Palestinian children in the West Bank than the prior seven years combined. Since the October 7 attacks in 2023, at least 169 children have been killed by Israeli forces and Jewish settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, according to the UN.

Meanwhile, 2024 was the third-deadliest year for Israelis in the West Bank since data collection began in 2008, according to the UN, which recorded the deaths of 34 Israelis – 15 soldiers and 19 civilians. Of those civilians, seven were settlers.

In August, the US announced sanctions against an Israeli organization, Hashomer Yosh, allegedly responsible for supporting settler violence in the West Bank against Palestinians, according to a State Department spokesperson.

Attacks have also come as the Israeli government ramped up approvals of Israeli settler housing. In July, Israel’s government approved a large land seizure in the occupied West Bank – the biggest since the 1993 Oslo Accords set out a path for peace between Israel and the Palestinians, according to the Israeli rights group Peace Now. The area was converted to state land, according to a document from the body, but the official notice wasn’t posted until days after, Peace Now said.

On Wednesday, the Israeli government is due to hold a construction planning meeting to discuss Israeli settlements housing approvals, the sixth consecutive week of Settlement Contruction Planning Meetings, according to Peace Now.

“The shift to weekly planning meetings represents both a normalization and intensification of settlement construction,” Peace Now said, adding that if the coming plans are approved, “the six-week total will reach 2,377 housing units. At this rate, 2025 could set new records, with projections exceeding 1,500 units per month,” Peace Now said, adding that it’s as a result of “policy changes” that have been introduced by Netanyahu and the current government.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Many small businesses are breathing a bit easier as inflation has cooled and the race for workers slows. But consumers’ steady embrace of credit cards is taking a growing bite out of their margins.

Gene-Christian Baca, the owner of Walter’s Hot Dogs in Mamaroneck and White Plains, New York, estimated that he now pays $50,000 a year in costs associated with processing credit card transactions, a sum he says has ballooned with rising card processing rates and more customers paying with cards over cash.

“Every year, 3% of all of our sales is washed away just to credit card processing,” he said.

A Visa credit card inserted into a card reader in Tiskilwa, Ill., on Sept. 18, 2018.Daniel Acker / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Merchants have long shouldered these “swipe fees,” the catchall term for businesses’ payments to banks and card companies each time customers swipe. While a federal rule caps debit card swipe fees at 21 cents per transaction, those for credit cards can be much higher.

And as many shoppers ditched cash for plastic cards or mobile payment apps, businesses have seen credit card transactions swell. They made up 32% of all U.S. consumer payments in 2023, up from 24% in 2019, according to a Federal Reserve study. Cash shrunk its share to 16% over the same period, down from 26%.

Spending on American Express, Discover, Mastercard and Visa cards in the U.S. soared to $5.25 trillion in the first half of 2024, up from around $4.98 trillion during the same period in 2023, according to data provided to NBC News by the Nilson Report, which covers the payments industry.

These shifts in customer habits have added to many businesses’ costs. Merchants paid an average of 2.26% in swipe fees for transactions using the Visa and Mastercard credit card networks in 2023, the latest year with available data, according to Nilson. The two companies accounted for more than $100 billion of the $172 billion in total U.S. swipe fees in 2023, Nilson said, and Visa accounted for 52% of credit card spending on the four major card networks.

Some of Visa’s fees are now going up. The card network raised two of the credit card swipe fees it charges banks and processing companies on Jan. 1. The move comes amid growing pushback from critics, including some lawmakers, who say swipe fees are excessive and frequently get passed on to shoppers.

“Most likely, higher swipe fees from Visa would mean higher prices for people at the store eventually,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree. “It’s unclear as to how quickly that would happen, but generally speaking, when these fees tend to go up, merchants would tend to pass those extra costs along to consumers.”

The Merchants Payments Coalition, an advocacy organization backed by leading restaurant, retail and other trade groups, estimates Visa’s additional fees will total $100 million per year.

“That seems like not a lot, but it increases the amount of every single transaction, and that really adds up over time,” said Doug Kantor, a member of the Merchants Payments Coalition’s executive committee and general counsel at the National Association of Convenience Stores.

The Merchants Payments Coalition says the $172 billion in swipe fees in 2023 set a record and estimates they cost the average family more than $1,100. The group is pushing for more transparency with credit card fees, more competition among networks and lower fees.

Visa says its changes are meant to make the network better. When confronted by policymakers about some of its swipe fees, the company has said that it “has no incentive to set [them] at levels that are too high or too low.”

A Visa spokesperson told NBC News in a statement: “We are constantly enhancing our network to better serve the businesses and consumers that increasingly choose to transact with us. Everything we do is designed to make paying and being paid with Visa more convenient, secure and reliable.”

The Electronic Payments Coalition, an advocacy group supporting card networks including Visa, says average swipe fees haven’t changed much over the last decade even as sales have increased. The organization has also noted that businesses incur distinct costs by handling cash. Those can range from operating cash registers to paying bank account fees.

Businesses handle swipe fees differently. Some, like Walter’s Hot Dogs, bake the costs into their prices. Others are trying to entice customers to use cash. Patz Deli in Manchester, New Hampshire, charges customers a 4% convenience fee for credit card transactions to cover the costs of processing fees and credit card equipment.

“It’s a cost that we don’t necessarily have to take on ourselves because it’s not our credit card,” said owner Pat Burns. “It’s your choice to use it, not ours, but we’re the ones who get charged for it.”

He said the deli introduced the convenience fee within the last couple of years as it faced mounting pressure from taxes, wages and other expenses.

“At the end of the month, by the time you bring home any type of money, 10 other people have already had their hands in it,” Burns said. “Even just a little bit like on the credit cards, 3, 4% goes a long way helping small businesses stay afloat.”

Consumer experts recommend using cash for small transactions, using rewards cards to make the most of each purchase and paying in person rather than over the phone when possible. Phone transactions often result in a higher fee for businesses due to security risks.

The fight over swipe fees has reached Congress. The Credit Card Competition Act, a bipartisan bill spearheaded by Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., aims to boost competition among credit card processing companies — something the Merchants Payments Coalition says is essential.

But the bill has stalled. Several groups supporting banks, credit card networks and credit unions are opposing the measure, saying it would harm small businesses and consumers, in part by limiting rewards.

“Swipe fees are definitely a really contentious thing and have been a battlefield between credit card issuers and networks and merchants for a long time,” said LendingTree’s Schulz. “It feels like that battle is really only going to keep going on for the next little while.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

A woman who worked as a hairstylist for Fox Sports alleges in a lawsuit that former host Skip Bayless made repeated, unwanted advances toward her — including an offer of $1.5 million to have sex with him.

Attorneys for Noushin Faraji, who was a hair stylist at Fox for more than a decade, are seeking unspecified damages from Bayless, Fox Sports and its parent company, Fox Corporation, according to a copy of the lawsuit filed Friday in California Superior Court in Los Angeles.

The complaint claims Fox executives fostered a hostile work environment that allowed senior managers and on-air personalities including Bayless to abuse workers without fear of punishment.

The Associated Press does not generally identify, in text or images, those who say they have been sexually assaulted or subjected to abuse unless they have publicly identified themselves as Faraji has in filing the lawsuit.

An attorney for Bayless, Jared Levine, did not immediately respond to AP’s telephone and text messages seeking comment. Email and phone messages left at Bayless’s talent company were not immediately returned.

Bayless could not be reached directly for comment.

Fox Sports said in a statement that it takes the allegations seriously but had no further comment given the pending lawsuit.

Faraji claimed that the advances by Bayless, which began in 2017 and continued until last year — included lingering hugs, kisses on the cheek and comments from Bayless that he could change Faraji’s life if she had sex with him.

In 2021, she claims in the suit, Bayless offered Faraji $1.5 million for sex and, after she refused, later threatened her job.

“Ms. Faraji knew that he was trying to pressure her into having sex with him, but she kept repeating that she was a professional that had to be kind to all talent,” the lawsuit says.

Bayless worked for Fox Sports until 2024 when his show was canceled after its ratings plummeted with the departure of his co-host, Shannon Sharpe.

Faraji said she was fired in 2024 based on “fabricated” reasons. The lawsuit said she initially remained quiet about her treatment at Fox, believing she could be in danger if she went public.

The suit also claims Fox employees were not paid their full wages or overtime. It seeks class-action status on behalf of other workers who allegedly were impacted.

In 2017 Fox Sports fired its head of programming amid a probe of sexual harassment allegations.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Has it been a while since the broader market indexes closed in the green? It certainly seems that way.

After what looked like a weak start to the new year, the stock market showed us it still had legs. The week’s trading day ended with the broader stock market indexes all closing in the green. But in the first half hour of the trading day, things didn’t look great. There was a lot of choppy movement, but it settled down and went higher and finished strong. Nine of the 11 S&P sectors closed higher with Consumer Discretionary at the top (more on that below).

Friday was the last day of the Santa Claus Rally. While Santa skipped Wall St. this year, Friday’s price action in the S&P 500 ($SPX) left investors optimistic. The S&P 500 was able to hold on to its November lows (see the daily chart of S&P 500 below), which is an encouraging sign. But we’re not out of the woods yet.

FIGURE 1. S&P 500 HOLDS ABOVE NOVEMBER LOWS. Friday’s price action was encouraging but increasing breadth would be more confirming of a turnaround.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Thursday’s price action was nerve-wracking — there was a time when the index was trading below its November lows. Fortunately, it recovered and closed a little above it. Friday’s close was encouraging, with the S&P 500 gaining 1.26%, hitting resistance at its 50-day simple moving average (SMA). But the market breadth indicators in the lower panels need to be stronger. The S&P 500 Bullish Percent Index is at 41, the NYSE Advance-Decline Line is declining, and the percentage of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 200-day moving average is 56.

Friday’s MarketCarpet based on the performance of the S&P 500 shows that heavy-weighted large caps such as NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Alphabet Inc. (GOOG and GOOGL), Meta Platforms (META), and Tesla Inc. (TSLA) ended the day higher.

FIGURE 2. MARKETCARPET FOR JANUARY 3. Most of the higher market cap stocks closed higher on Friday.Image source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

TSLA had a massive move rising 8.10% closing the gap between December 31 and January 2. TSLA is a stock to monitor, especially since it has a deep connection with the new administration set to take office on January 20. The stock bounced on Friday after five down days.

NVDA’s stock price also had an impressive rally on Friday after consolidating since early November. These two stocks, TSLA and NVDA, helped the Consumer Discretionary and Technology sectors take the top two positions in Friday’s sector performance.

Overall, Friday’s price action was a ray of hope that perhaps the January Barometer  — as the S&P 500 goes in January, so goes the year — might be the one out of the trifecta that can come through. The January Barometer was devised by Yale Hirsch and has an 83.3% accuracy rate.

Steel, Beer, and Used Cars

While many tech stocks saw big gains, it wasn’t the same for US Steel Group (X). President Biden blocked the takeover of the company by Nippon Steel, resulting in a 6.53% drop in the price of X.

Alcoholic beverage companies didn’t have a great day either after US Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, said alcoholic drinks should include cancer risk warnings on their labels. Shares of Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD), Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP), Boston Beer Co. (SAM), and Constellation Brands (STZ) all fell on Friday.

Shares of Carvana (CVNA) fell over 11% after Hindenberg Research accused the company of accounting manipulation. Although Carvana denied the allegations and the stock received an upgrade from J.P. Morgan analysts, it didn’t help lift the stock price. CVNA’s stock price fell 17.53% (see chart below).

FIGURE 3. WEEKLY CHART OF CVNA STOCK. Two sets of Fibonacci retracement levels are drawn on the chart, one from a previous high to low (blue) and another from a more recent low to high (red).Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Carvana had a high StockCharts Technical Rank (SCTR) score, and we’ve covered the stock in our past SCTR Reports. Once the SCTR score fell below the 90 level on December 23, it raised a red flag. Combine that with a break below the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement from a previous high to low (blue line) and a relative strength index below 70 and you have a clear sell signal.

It will be interesting to see how this story develops. If things clear up and CVNA can show that it didn’t engage in accounting manipulations, the stock price could turn around and rise quickly.

Yields, US Dollar, Oil

The bond market had a choppy day. The 10-year yield closed at 4.596%, which hurt bond prices. The US dollar surged on Thursday but pulled back a bit on Friday. The chart of the Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) displays that Friday’s price action was within Thursday’s range. There’s no sign of a weakness in the US dollar, which continues to remain strong.

FIGURE 4. DAILY CHART OF INVESCO DB US DOLLAR INDEX BULLISH FUND. The dollar has been rising steadily since October.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Crude oil prices rose today. The United States Oil Fund (USO) was up 1.83% on Thursday and up 1.29% on Friday. Oil prices have been going sideways since October but recent price action shows that it may be breaking out of its slump.

For a short trading week, that’s a lot of moving parts. Although stocks closed higher on Friday, there’s still not enough clarity on the charts to show a reversal. Next week could tell a different story.

End-of-Week Wrap-Up

  • S&P 500 down 0.48% for the week, at 5942.47, Dow Jones Industrial Average down 0.60% for the week at 42,732.13; Nasdaq Composite down 0.51% for the week at 19,621.68
  • $VIX up 1.13% for the week, closing at 16.13
  • Best performing sector for the week: Energy
  • Worst performing sector for the week: Materials
  • Top 5 Large Cap SCTR stocks: Applovin Corp. (APP); Palantir Technologies (PLTR); Reddit Inc. (RDDT); Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB); MicroStrategy Inc. (MSTR)

On the Radar Next Week

  • December PMI
  • November Factory Orders
  • November JOLTS Report
  • December ISM Services
  • December Non-Farm Payrolls
  • FOMC Minutes
  • Fed speeches from Cook, Barkin, Schmid, and Bowman

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

Mexico opened the possibility Friday of receiving non-Mexican migrants deported by the United States after initially saying they would push President-elect Donald Trump to return other nationalities directly to their countries of origin.

President Claudia Sheinbaum said during her daily press briefing that in cases where the US would not return migrants to their countries “we can collaborate through different mechanisms.”

She did not offer details, but Mexico could limit it to certain nationalities or request compensation from the US to move the deportees from Mexico to their home countries.

“There will be time to speak with the United States government if these deportations really happen, but we will receive them here, we are going to receive them properly and we have a plan,” she said. Sheinbaum had prefaced her comments by saying Mexico is not in favor of them.

Trump has promised to begin massive deportations. Critics have observed that there will be logistical challenges to significantly ramping up from the already high deportation numbers.

The deportations would be immediately felt in northern Mexico’s border cities, which struggle with high levels of organized crime and where non-Mexican migrants would make easy targets for kidnapping and extortion.

That happened during Trump’s first term, when thousands seeking US asylum were forced to wait out the process in Mexico. Many thousands more migrants who crossed into the US were sent back to Mexico under a public health provision held over from the COVID-19 pandemic.

In December, Sheinbaum had said she planned to ask Trump to deport non-Mexicans directly to their home countries.

Mexico, like any other country, is not obligated to accept non-Mexican migrants, but it has agreed to do so in the recent past, especially from countries like Cuba and Venezuela, which often refuse deportation flights from the United States, but may accept them from Mexico.

Mexico temporarily stopped deportations in December 2023 due to a lack of funds and they were substantially reduced during 2024 compared to 2023 and 2022.

Mexico wants to host a meeting of the region’s foreign ministers this month to discuss immigration.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

As digital payments and fintech services continue to reshape the global economy, Block, Inc. (SQ) stands out as a potential beneficiary of this shift. A favorable technical signal and an attractive fundamental backdrop present a compelling bullish thesis for SQ. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this positive outlook and discuss a strategy you can use to capitalize on it — all identified instantly through the OptionsPlay Strategy Center on StockCharts.com.

Technical Analysis

A closer look at SQ’s chart reveals several bullish indicators:

  • Breakout and Retest of Support. After breaking above the $84 resistance area in November, SQ has since come back to retest this level as support.
  • Strong Risk/Reward Setup. The successful retest suggests a favorable risk/reward, where the downside risk is far more limited than the upside potential to our upside target of $150.

FIGURE 1. SQ STOCK DAILY CHART. The stock is retesting its $84 area as support.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Fundamental Analysis

From a fundamental perspective, SQ’s outlook remains promising:

  • Attractive Valuation. Despite Block’s strong growth prospects, the company is currently trading at a 30% discount relative to its peers.
  • Robust Growth Metrics. SQ’s expected 44% earnings per share (EPS) growth is nearly three times higher than its peers’ 13%, highlighting the company’s potential for earnings expansion. Projected 11% revenue growth outstrips the industry median of 7%, confirming the company’s ability to expand its top line.
  • Recent Earnings Insights. Block’s Q3 2024 results showed robust growth in gross profit and a significant turnaround in net income, fueled by the strength of its Cash App and Square ecosystems. While there were some concerns around revenue shortfalls and ongoing regulatory scrutiny of Cash App, the company remains optimistic about continued margin expansion into 2025, forecasting at least 15% overall gross profit growth and new initiatives to drive further gains.

These fundamentals suggest that SQ is well-positioned to capitalize on the continued rise of digital payments, offering investors a potentially rewarding opportunity at current valuations.


Options Strategy

To leverage SQ’s bullish outlook, the OptionsPlay Strategy Center suggests selling the Feb 14 $86/80 Bull Put Spread @ $2.30 Credit.

This entails the following:

  • Sell: February 14, 2025, $86 Put at $4.60
  • Buy: February 14, 2025, $80 Put at $2.30
  • Net Credit: $2.30 per share ($230 total per contract)

FIGURE 2. DETAILS OF A PUT VERTICAL SPREAD IN SQ STOCK.

Trade Details

  • Maximum Potential Reward: $230
  • Maximum Potential Risk: $370
  • Breakeven Point: $83.70 (strike of the sold put minus the net credit per share)
  • Probability of Profit: ~56.46% (if SQ closes above $83.70 by February 14, 2025)

By selling a higher strike put and buying a lower strike put, you collect a premium upfront and benefit if SQ stays above the breakeven price at expiration. This strategy offers a balanced approach to potential upside while containing risk.

Unlock Real-Time Trade Ideas With OptionsPlay Strategy Center

This bullish setup in SQ was identified almost instantly using the OptionsPlay Strategy Center at StockCharts.com. By running a Bullish Trend Following scan, the platform highlighted SQ and structured the optimal options trade without the need for extensive research or guesswork.

FIGURE 3. THE BULLISH TREND FOLLOWING SCAN HIGHLIGHTED SQ AS A POTENTIAL OPTIONS TRADING CANDIDATE.

Subscribing to the OptionsPlay Strategy Center provides you with:

  • Automated Market Scans. Quickly spot the best trading opportunities aligned with your market outlook.
  • Optimal Trade Structuring. Leverage data-driven tools to craft high-probability, risk-defined strategies.
  • Time-Saving Insights. Eliminate hours of manual analysis — receive real-time alerts and ideas within seconds.

Don’t let valuable opportunities slip away. Subscribe to the OptionsPlay Strategy Center today, and elevate your trading with the guidance and clarity you need to make informed decisions. Find the best options trades swiftly, every single day, and empower your investing journey with this cutting-edge tool.

Venezuela’s exiled former presidential candidate, Edmundo González Urrutia, returns to South America Friday in a show of defiance as Caracas prepares to inaugurate current President Nicolas Maduro, who has been in office since 2013.

González’s first stop: a meeting with Argentina’s far-right President Javier Milei in Buenos Aires on Saturday. Milei has been a vocal critic of the Venezuelan regime, calling Maduro a “criminal” after Venezuela expelled Argentina’s diplomats in the aftermath of the contentious election, which was marred with allegations of vote rigging.

It is unclear where else González plans on going during his tour; he has previously pledged to return to Venezuela to inaugurate his own government.

The former diplomat fled the country in September and sought asylum in Spain after a warrant was issued for his arrest by Venezuela’s public prosecutor’s office, amid a crackdown on the country’s opposition movement.

The warrant capped off a fractious few months, which saw Venezuela’s National Electoral Council (CNE), a body stacked with Maduro allies, formally declare the longtime strongman the winner of the July 28 election -– without providing voting tallies.

The official results attracted widespread skepticism from abroad as the opposition insisted that it had won, releasing tens of thousands of voting tallies gathered from across the country, that they said proved González won by a landslide.

The United States and Argentina, among others, have gone on to recognize González as Venezuela’s rightful president-elect.

But Maduro has repeatedly dismissed claims that the vote was stolen, and says he is ready to begin a new term on January 10.

For González, returning to Venezuela would be filled with risk. On Thursday, Venezuela’s Scientific, Criminal and Criminal Investigation Corps (CICPC) offered a $100,000 reward for information leading to González’s arrest, it said on Instagram.

CICPC said González is wanted for several crimes, including conspiracy, complicity in the use of violent acts against the republic, usurpation of functions, forgery of documents, money laundering, disregard for State institutions, instigation to disobedience of the law and criminal association.

This post appeared first on cnn.com