Archive

June 28, 2025

Browsing

Following an exciting rally in recent months, shares of JPMorgan and Bank of America may now be running on fumes only, according to a senior Baird analyst.

David George recommends a more cautious stance on the two money center banks since their risk-reward profiles have become increasingly unattractive as valuations stretch and expectations soar.

Despite their reputations as “gold standard” institutions, the case for trimming exposure – or even selling outright – is gaining traction.

Why it may now be time to sell JPMorgan stock

JPM has handily outperformed the S&P 500 index this year, with shares currently up 35% versus their year-to-date low in early April.

But that outperformance did come at a cost – “valuation”.  

JPMorgan shares are currently going for a record 2.9 times tangible book value and a forward P/E ratio of 15.5, indicating a lot of the good news is already baked in.

On Friday, David George downgraded JPM stock to “underperform” with a price target of $235 indicating potential downside of about 18% from current levels.

According to the Baird analyst, JPMorgan continues to boast an exceptionally strong balance sheet and retains its dominance in the financial services industry – but “future returns will likely not be what they’ve been the last several years at these valuation levels.”

Simply put, this best-in-class franchise will likely prove a poor investment given the expectations are too high.

With capital markets reopening and deregulation providing tailwinds, the bullish narrative is compelling – but perhaps too widely embraced. George’s contrarian view is that valuation still matters, and in JPM’s case, it may be signaling a ceiling rather than a floor.

Why it may now be time to sell Bank of America stock

BofA has also enjoyed a solid run in recent months, with shares up some 12% currently versus the April low. Still, David George downgraded the bank stock today to “neutral”.

His $52 price target on the Bank of America shares implies modest upside, but not nearly enough to justify fresh buying at current levels.

Baird had previously upgraded BAC in April – believing the market was underestimating the firm’s earnings power. But with the stock now reflecting improved net interest margins and a more favorable capital markets backdrop, he believes the easy gains are behind it.

“We remain huge fans of the BAC franchise,” he wrote, “but feel like the stock is largely reflecting it here.”

In short, while BofA stock may not be overvalued to the same extent as JPM, it’s no longer the bargain it once was – and that makes it a hold at best, or a sell for those seeking better asymmetric opportunities.

All in all, with both stocks trading near highs and sentiment running hot, now may be the time to take profits before gravity sets in, George concluded.

The post JPM, BAC – two gold standard bank stocks you should ‘sell’ now appeared first on Invezz

Freegold Ventures Limited (TSX: FVL) (OTCQX: FGOVF) (‘Freegold’ or the ‘Company ‘) is pleased to announce that all matters set out in the Management Information Circular dated May 26 2025 for the 2025 Annual General and Special Meeting of Shareholders held on June 27, 2025 (the ‘Meeting’) were approved by the shareholders holding 98,154,137 shares were voted representing approximately ~ 18.56% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

The following nine nominees were elected as directors of Freegold. The detailed results of the vote for the election of directors are set out below:

MOTIONS

NUMBER OF SHARES

PERCENTAGE OF VOTES CAST

FOR

AGAINST

WITHHELD/
ABSTAIN

FOR

AGAINST

WITHHELD/
ABSTAIN

To elect as Director :Kristina Walcott

96,353,303

1,800,834

98.165 %

1.835 %

To Elect as Director: Alvin Jackson

97,016,593

1,137,544

98.841 %

1.159 %

To Elect as Director: David Knight

85,790,018

12,364,119

87.403 %

12.597 %

To Elect as Director: Garnet Dawson

97,308,977

845,160

99.139 %

0.861 %

To Elect as Director: Ron Ewing

96,839,477

1,314,660

98.661 %

1.339 %

To Elect as Director: Glen Dickson

85,396,927

12,757,210

87.003 %

12.997 %

To Elect as Director: Reagan Glazier

79,513,338

18,640,799

81.009 %

18.991 %

To Elect as Director: Maurice Tagami

97,900,807

253,330

99.742 %

0.258 %

To Elect as Director: Vivienne Artz

93,614,569

4,539,568

95.375 %

4.625 %

The Company’s shareholders approved the appointment of Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, as the Company’s auditors, as set forth in the management information circular.

The Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s new omnibus equity incentive plan.

Each of the matters voted upon at the Meeting is discussed in detail in the Company’s Information Circular dated May 26 th, 2025, which is filed under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.com.

Golden Summit Project Update:

Drilling at Golden Summit is progressing well. Drilling is focused on resource definition, which includes both expansion and infill drilling, as well as geotechnical and metallurgical holes. Like the 2024 drill program, the current efforts aim to upgrade inferred resources to indicated status in preparation for the upcoming pre-feasibility study, which is expected to commence later this year. An updated mineral resource estimate is expected to be finalised soon, and the initial assay results from the 2025 drill program are also anticipated shortly.

The Qualified Person for this release is Alvin Jackson , P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration and Development for Freegold, who has approved the scientific and technical disclosure in this news release.

About Freegold Ventures Limited  
Freegold is a TSX-listed company focused on exploration in Alaska . It holds the Golden Summit Gold Project near Fairbanks and the Shorty Creek Copper-Gold Project near Livengood through leases.

Some statements in this news release contain forward-looking information, including, without limitation, statements as to planned expenditures and exploration programs, potential mineralization and resources, exploration results, the completion of an updated NI 43-101 technical report, and any other future plans. These statements address future events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the statements. Such factors include, without limitation, the completion of planned expenditures, the ability to complete exploration programs on schedule, and the success of exploration programs. See Freegold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31st, 2024 , filed under Freegold’s profile at www.sedar.com , for a detailed discussion of the risk factors associated with Freegold’s operations. On January 30, 2020 , the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global health emergency. Reactions to the spread of COVID-19 continue to lead to, among other things, significant restrictions on travel, business closures, quarantines, and a general reduction in economic activity. While these effects have been reduced in recent months, the continuation and re-introduction of significant restrictions, business disruptions, and related financial impact, and the duration of any such disruptions cannot be reasonably estimated. The risks to Freegold of such public health crises also include employee health and safety risks and a slowdown or temporary suspension of operations in geographic locations impacted by an outbreak. Such public health crises, as well as global geopolitical crises, can result in volatility and disruptions in the supply and demand for various products and services, global supply chains, and financial markets, as well as declining trade and market sentiment and reduced mobility of people, all of which could affect interest rates, credit ratings, credit risk, and inflation. As a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, Freegold has implemented a COVID management program and established a full-service Camp at Golden Summit to attempt to mitigate risks to its employees, contractors, and community. While the extent to which COVID-19 may impact Freegold is uncertain, it is possible that COVID-19 may have a material adverse effect   on Freegold’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

SOURCE Freegold Ventures Limited

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2025/27/c9322.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

A Senate Democrat’s push to put a check on President Donald Trump’s powers and reaffirm the Senate’s war authority was shut down by lawmakers in the upper chamber Thursday.

Sen. Tim Kaine’s war powers resolution, which would have required Congress to debate and vote on whether the president could declare war, or strike Iran, was struck down in the Senate on a largely party-line vote, save for Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., a staunch advocate of Israel who supported Trump’s strike on the Islamic Republic, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has been vocal in his thoughts about congressional war powers in recent days.

Earlier in the week, the Virginia Democrat vowed to move ahead with the resolution despite a fragile ceasefire brokered between Israel and Iran following weekend strikes on the Islamic Republic’s key nuclear facilities that were not given the green-light by Congress.

Kaine argued that the ceasefire gave his resolution more credence and breathing room to properly debate the role that Congress plays when it comes to authorizing both war and attacks abroad.

He said ahead of the vote on the Senate floor that he came to Washington to ensure that the country does not again get into another ‘unnecessary’ war, and invoked the rush to approve war powers for President George W. Bush over two decades ago to engage with Iraq.

‘I think the events of this week have demonstrated that war is too big to consign to the decisions of any one person,’ Kaine said. 

Indeed, his resolution became a focal point for a debate that has raged on Capitol Hill since Israel began its bombing campaign against Iran: whether the strikes like those carried out during Operation Midnight Hammer constituted an act of war that required congressional approval, or if Trump’s decision was under his constitutional authority as commander in chief.  

Senate Republicans have widely argued that Trump was well within his purview, while most Senate Democrats raised constitutional concerns about the president’s ability to carry out a strike without lawmakers weighing in. 

Experts have argued, too, that Trump was within his executive authority to strike Iran. 

The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the White House, giving lawmakers the sole power to declare war, while the president acts as the commander in chief directing the military. 

And nearly two centuries later, at the height of the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 was born, which sought to further define those roles.

But the most impact lawmakers could have is through the power of the purse, and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, who plays a large role in controlling the purse strings as the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, had a sharp message against Kaine’s resolution. 

McConnell used instances where Democratic presidents over the last three decades have used their authority for limited engagements in Kosovo, Libya, Syria and Yemen, and questioned why ‘isolationists’ would consider the strike on Iran to kneecap its nuclear program a mistake. 

‘I have not heard the frequent flyers on War Powers resolutions reckon seriously with these questions,’ he said. ‘Until they do, efforts like this will remain divorced from both strategic and constitutional reality.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS