Archive

June 2, 2025

Browsing

Social media platform X, under the ownership of Elon Musk, is introducing a new messaging feature dubbed ‘XChat’, which Musk claims will incorporate “Bitcoin-style encryption.”

This development, alongside a forthcoming payments feature called X Money, signals X’s continued ambition to evolve into an “everything app,” though Musk’s specific technical claims about encryption have drawn swift reactions and clarifications from the Bitcoin community.

XChat is being positioned as a significantly more feature-rich iteration of the platform’s existing direct messaging function.

According to a June 1 X post by Musk, the new service will boast audio and video calling capabilities, “encryption, vanishing messages, and the ability to send any kind of file.”

Musk further elaborated that XChat is built on the Rust programming language, which he stated had “(Bitcoin style) encryption, whole new architecture.”

This announcement follows a statement from X on May 29, indicating a temporary pause on its encrypted messaging feature to implement improvements, a move that may have been linked to the development and imminent release of XChat.

Crypto community reacts: debating ‘Bitcoin-style encryption’

Musk’s assertion regarding XChat’s ‘Bitcoin-style encryption’ immediately spurred a flurry of responses from prominent figures within the Bitcoin community.

Many were quick to point out the technical nuances of Bitcoin’s security model.

JAN3 CEO Samson Mow, for instance, stated that “Bitcoin isn’t encrypted” in the traditional sense of data obfuscation.

Crypto influencer “Pledditor” added a clarifying detail, noting that Bitcoin “uses elliptic curve cryptography.”

Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr also weighed in, asserting that “Bitcoin doesn’t even use encryption” for its core transaction data and further expressed an opinion that using the Rust programming language was “a bad idea for security reasons.”

Offering a potential interpretation of Musk’s comment, BitMEX Research suggested,

“Maybe Musk means like BIP-151 peer-to-peer communication encryption,” referring to a specific Bitcoin Improvement Proposal designed to encrypt communication data between Bitcoin nodes, rather than the transaction data on the blockchain itself.

It’s important to understand that Bitcoin’s security primarily relies on elliptic curve cryptography, which functions like a sophisticated mathematical lock system.

Users possess a secret private key and a corresponding public key that is mathematically derived from it.

This system allows holders to prove ownership of their Bitcoin and authorize transactions without ever revealing their private key, ensuring security without the need for a central authority.

Bitcoin also utilizes SHA-256 hashing for validating transactions and creating unique block and transaction identifiers.

X money payments feature on the horizon

In addition to the XChat rollout, Elon Musk confirmed on May 25 that X is also developing a payments feature named ‘X Money’.

This service is slated to launch in a beta version later this year. Musk emphasized a cautious approach to its introduction, stating that testing will involve a “very limited access beta at first”.

He added, “when people’s savings are involved, extreme care must be taken,” highlighting the sensitivity and responsibility associated with financial services.

These new offerings underscore X’s ongoing transformation since Musk’s acquisition of the platform (then known as Twitter) in October 2022.

Musk has long articulated his vision of turning X into an “everything app,” akin to platforms like WeChat, by integrating a wide array of features and services that extend beyond typical social media functionalities.

The introduction of XChat and the forthcoming X Money suggests X is now actively positioning itself to compete with established encrypted messaging platforms such as Telegram and Signal, while also setting its sights on popular fintech applications like Venmo and Cash App.

The post ‘Bitcoin-style encryption’ for XChat? Musk’s claim sparks debate appeared first on Invezz

Canada’s mining sector is gaining momentum, with over 130 projects with a total value of C$117.1 billion now planned or in construction, according to Natural Resources Canada’s 2024 inventory. That’s an increase of nine projects and C$23.5 billion from the previous year, signaling strong interest in resource development.

Yet despite this growth, the path to production remains slow. A study published in FACETS and cited by the Mining Association of Canada shows that the average timeline from discovery to production exceeds 17 years, highlighting the pressing need to streamline Canada’s complex and often lengthy permitting process.

Although miners, explorers and developers have long criticized the decades-long process, Canada’s federal and provincial governments have only recently begun working to expedite the process in an effort to harness the country’s vast critical minerals potential and assert the nation’s dominance in resource extraction.

The federal government has committed to expediting and streamlining the permitting process, laying out ambitious targets in its 2024 budget. Those goals include completing federal impact assessments and permitting for designated mining projects within five years, and within two years for non-designated projects.

Achieving these targets will involve establishing a federal mining permitting coordinator, enhancing funding for federal review authorities and promoting concurrent regulatory reviews to reduce duplication and delays

Provincial governments also play a significant role in mining project approvals.

A May 2025 report from the Mining Association of BC, outlines the economic potential of 27 advanced-stage mining projects in the province totaling more than C$90 billion. The projects highlighted in the report are described as new; however, there are several past-producing assets that are being offered a new lease on life.

One of those projects is Blue Lagoon Resources’ (CSE:BLLG,OTCQB:BLAGF) Dome Mountain gold project.

Located 50 minutes from Smithers, the 22,000 hectare property hosts the historic Dome Mountain mine, where past exploration and development were focused on the Boulder Vein, initially discovered in the 1980s.

In February, Blue Lagoon secured the final permit needed to advance its Dome Mountain project, clearing the way for production to begin in Q3 2025. The permit — one of just nine mining permits granted in BC since 2015 — marks a significant milestone for the junior miner, and positions the company to transition from an explorer to a gold and silver miner.

The path to production at Dome Mountain

Although Dome Mountain was in production between 1980 and 1993 under different management, securing permits to restart activity at the 30 year old brownfield proved as complex as starting up a greenfield project.

“It wasn’t easy at all,” said Vig. “They say that it takes over 15 years to get a mine permit in BC, and people are congratulating us that we got it in just under five. And personally, I thought it was four years too late.”

He went on to note, “Imagine being in any business that you have to wait. You know, you open up your restaurant, but then you have to wait for five years to open it. I mean, it’s incredibly difficult to get a mining permit”

Indeed, BC has one of Canada’s longest permitting processes. A 2019 report from Resource World notes that it takes six months on average to get an exploration permit in Canada. However, in BC, it can take 15 to18 months.

National and provincial critical minerals strategies have been established over the last six years, and parties on both sides of the aisle have promised policy reforms. But Vig underscored the challenges that remain.

“I think we want to believe that,” he said of the notion that the permitting process will be expedited through the critical minerals push. “I think the politicians are certainly saying that, but I’m not so confident that the execution can be there,” he continued. “Because, you know, you’ve got many factors. You’ve got the infrastructure of the government itself, the bureaucracy. There are only so many people that are able to process these applications.”

Indigenous consultation and permitting with purpose

A key requirement in the permitting process is Indigenous community consultation, engagement and approval, an area provincial governments have struggled to seamlessly integrate into the process.

For Blue Lagoon, communication and consultation with the Lake Babine Nation started early and remains a key tenet.

The Lake Babine Nation is one of BC’s largest Indigenous communities, with over 2,500 registered members. Its traditional territory surrounds Babine Lake, the province’s longest natural lake.

“We have a great relationship with the Lake Babine Nation,” said Vig. “You know, honestly, it was a very simple process. It’s a philosophy, that is very rudimentary, certainly in my culture.” Vig, who is of Indian heritage, moved to Canada in 1972 with his family, credits those formative years for fostering his deep sense of respect.

“My whole upbringing is all about respect. So for us, it was very simple — respect the people, respect the land,” he said, adding that a lot of it was common sense. “Protect the water, protect the land and make sure you don’t damage it as you go along (are) good practices (for) any business,” Vig emphasized.

Water conservation and protection is especially important to Blue Lagoon, an issue Vig described as “a way of life” due to its significance for fishing and cultural practices.

‘You don’t wait to be asked — you take the initiative to understand what matters most,” he said.

As he explained, provincial regulatory requirements called for water testing at five sites along a specific stream, and Blue Lagoon chose to conduct testing at nine locations instead.

“It’s really unheard of in our industry, to the best of my knowledge. We didn’t just do what was required of us. We like to go above and beyond to make sure. And when you do things like that, I think the sincerity comes across,” he said.

Financing in a tough market

Another challenge junior miners are facing is accessing funding. Investors who once used added liquidity to the space have moved to other sectors like tech, leaving mining coffers on the decline.

Blue Lagoon has been fortunate in terms of capital raising; the company completed the final tranche of its most recent private placement in late April, raising C$2.23 million through the issuance of 8.9 million units at C$0.25 each.

The full offering brought in C$4.87 million over four tranches, fully funding Dome Mountain to production.

Blue Lagoon’s ability to fast track its permitting and funding process were praised by mining committee chair Yannis Tsitos, who has more than two decades of experience in the mining sector working for companies like global commodities giant BHP (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP). Drawing on his history with large-scale operations, Tsitos described the Blue Lagoon’s approach as unusually nimble and disciplined.

“We haven’t cut a single corner,” he said, noting that while major players can afford to raise hundreds of millions upfront, most juniors must build organically. “What’s impressive is how this team — led by Rana — used creativity and persistence to move forward without delay,” he added. “It’s not about size; it’s about profitability and execution.”

He emphasized that Dome Mountain’s 15,000 ounce per year potential is just the beginning.

“Every major company started with one mine,” said Tsitos. “This could be the first step in something much bigger, and it’s happening right here in BC, which is hungry for investment.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett says he remains ‘very, very confident’ that courts will support President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda.

Hassett made the statement during a Sunday morning appearance on ABC’s ‘This Week,’ telling host George Stephanopoulos that the White House still expects ‘Plan A’ to work out.

‘And so we’re very thrilled. We are very confident that the judges would uphold this law. And so I think that that’s Plan A, and we’re very, very confident that Plan A is all we’re ever going to need,’ Hassett said.

‘But if, for some reason, some judge were to say that it’s not a national emergency when more Americans die from fentanyl than have ever died in all American wars combined, that’s not an emergency that the president has authority over – if that ludicrous statement is made by a judge somewhere, then we’ll have other alternatives that we can pursue as well to make sure that we make American trade fair again,’ he added.

Hassett’s appearance comes after a federal court struck down Trump’s tariffs in a ruling last week, only for an appeals court to issue a temporary stay protecting the tariffs during litigation.

The appeals court ruling paused a decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), thus allowing Trump to continue to enact the 10% baseline tariff and the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ that he announced April 2 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. 

The CIT had ruled unanimously to block the tariffs the day before.

Members of the three-judge panel who were appointed by Trump, former President Barack Obama and former President Ronald Reagan, ruled unanimously that Trump had overstepped his authority under IEEPA.

They noted that, as commander in chief, Trump does not have ‘unbounded authority’ to impose tariffs under the emergency law.

For now, the burden of proof shifts to the government, which must convince the court it will suffer ‘irreparable harm’ if the injunction remains in place, a high legal standard the Trump administration must meet.

Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS